# Chandler v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · August 21, 1992 · 615 So. 2d 100

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9934844

## Case

- **Full name:** A.A. Chandler v. State.
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
- **Decided:** August 21, 1992
- **Citations:** 615 So. 2d 100; 1992 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1032; 1992 WL 201012
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Montiel
- **Judges:** McMillan, Montiel
- **Cited by:** 19 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9934844

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- stating that the prosecutor has a right to comment on statements made by defense counsel in closing argument.

## Opinion text

I concur in the majority's affirmance of the appellant's convictions on Counts III, IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII, for violation of the State Ethics Law. Ala. Code § 36-25-5 (1975).
I respectfully dissent from the majority's conclusion that the appellant did not have the intent to deprive the owner of his property and I would vote to affirm the appellant's convictions on Counts I and II for the offenses of theft by deception in the first degree.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9934844. Public record. Not legal advice.