# Enterprise Bd. of Educ. v. C.P.

> Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · November 1, 1996 · 698 So. 2d 131

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9934471

## Case

- **Full name:** Enterprise City Board of Education v. C.P., by and Through Her Parents and Next Friends, J.P. and M.P.
- **Court:** Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
- **Decided:** November 1, 1996
- **Citations:** 698 So. 2d 131; 1996 WL 637382
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Robertson
- **Judges:** Crawley, Monroe, Robertson
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9934471

## Opinion text

I respectfully dissent. Ala. Code 1975, § 12-15-30(c)(2) vests the juvenile court with jurisdiction over this case. That court heard evidence, ore tenus, and its determination is presumed correct unless plainly and palpably wrong. J.L.B. v. State Department of Human Resources , 608 So.2d 1367
(Ala.Civ.App. 1992); Matter of Young , 456 So.2d 823 (Ala.Civ.App. 1984). The juvenile court found that an eight-week expulsion of a model student was not an appropriate penalty for an unintentional violation of a school board rule. After a careful review of the record in this case, I believe that the juvenile court's determination is supported by the evidence. I would therefore affirm. *Page 134

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9934471. Public record. Not legal advice.