# Edward D. Jones & Co., LP v. Wehby

> Supreme Court of Alabama · November 21, 2003 · 882 So. 2d 832

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9933669

## Case

- **Full name:** Edward D. Jones Co., Lp v. John Herbert Wehby
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** November 21, 2003
- **Citations:** 882 So. 2d 832; 2003 Ala. LEXIS 428; 2003 WL 22753436
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Johnstone
- **Judges:** Johnstone, Rationale, See
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9933669

## Opinion text

I concur in that part of the rationale to the effect that "the relationship between J J Com and Jones involved interstate commerce," 882 So.2d at 837, except that I express no opinion on the reliance on Citizens Bank v. Alafabco, Inc. , 539 U.S. 52 , 123 S.Ct. 2037 , 156 L.Ed.2d 46 (2003), and Wolff Motor Co. v. White , 869 So.2d 1129 (Ala. 2003). I likewise express no opinion on any other aspect of the analysis of the sufficiency of the nexus between this transaction and interstate commerce to invoke the Federal Arbitration Act. I concur in footnote 1 to the effect that Wehby is bound by the arbitration agreement. Finally, I concur in the judgment. *Page 838

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9933669. Public record. Not legal advice.