# Progressive Specialty Ins. v. Hammonds

> Supreme Court of Alabama · September 15, 1989 · 551 So. 2d 333

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9933361

## Case

- **Full name:** Progressive Specialty Insurance Company v. Ellis Monroe Hammonds.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** September 15, 1989
- **Citations:** 551 So. 2d 333; 1989 Ala. LEXIS 663; 1989 WL 122314
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Maddox
- **Judges:** Adams, Maddox
- **Cited by:** 23 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9933361

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- applying principle set forth in Auto-OwnersIns. Co. v. Hudson

## Opinion text

I dissent, for the same reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Auto-Owners *Page 338 Ins. Co. v. Hudson , 547 So.2d 467 (Ala. 1989).
In view of what I consider to be an erroneous interpretation of Alabama's uninsured motorist statutes, the Legislature is now the only place where an insurer may go for relief, if it has been aggrieved.
STEAGALL, J., concurs.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9933361. Public record. Not legal advice.