# McCoo v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · June 25, 2004 · 921 So. 2d 446

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9933125

## Case

- **Full name:** Carl Ray McCoo v. State of Alabama.
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
- **Decided:** June 25, 2004
- **Citations:** 921 So. 2d 446; 2004 WL 1418199
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Shaw
- **Judges:** McMillan, Shaw
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- **Red flag:** Reversed on other grounds by Ex Parte State, 921 So. 2d 450 (2005).
- Negative treatments: 1
- Distinguished by: 0
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9933125

## Opinion text

It is apparent from the trial court's order that McCoo's probation was revoked because he committed a new offense — first degree robbery. The reason for revocation is, thus, sufficiently stated to satisfy the pertinent due-process requirements. Based on Wyatt v. State , 608 So.2d 762 (Ala. 1992), I concur to remand for a statement of the evidence relied on.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9933125. Public record. Not legal advice.