# Brown v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · December 23, 2005 · 939 So. 2d 957

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9932347

## Case

- **Full name:** Mark Lynn Brown v. State of Alabama.
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
- **Decided:** December 23, 2005
- **Citations:** 939 So. 2d 957; 2005 WL 3507985
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Baschab
- **Judges:** Baschab, Shaw
- **Cited by:** 6 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9932347

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that the circuit court’s failure to apply the mandatory enhancements contained in § 13A-12-231(13) renders the appellant’s sentence illegal

## Opinion text

I concur with the majority's conclusion that the issue of the admissibility of the certificate of analysis is not properly before this court for review. However, I dissent because I believe the majority should also analyze whether the appellant's convictions for both first-degree unlawful manufacture of a controlled substance (methamphetamine) and trafficking in methamphetamine violate double jeopardy principles.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9932347. Public record. Not legal advice.
