# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · October 9, 1997

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/993204

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 9, 1997
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/993204

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6100

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GARY A. BROWN, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-91-297, CA-96-2721-6-13)

Submitted: September 23, 1997 Decided: October 9, 1997

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary A. Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Harold Watson Gowdy, III,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997),

and order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United
States v. Brown, Nos. CR-91-297; CA-96-2721-6-13 (D.S.C. Nov. 22,

1996; Dec. 24, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

DISMISSED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/993204. Public record. Not legal advice.