# Jermall Brown v. BOCSE McGuire, Esq.

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · February 2, 2024

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9929741

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** February 2, 2024
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9929741

## Opinion text

USCA4 Appeal: 23-2110 Doc: 5 Filed: 02/02/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-2110

JERMALL BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BOCSE MCGUIRE, ESQ.; MARTIN / ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY;
MAGISTRATE SUMLIN; JUDGE RUBIN; JUDGE PHILIP JACKSON; JUDGE
KENDRA AUSBY; JUDGE J. SCHIFFER; JUDGE MIDDLETON; SPECIAL
COUNSEL KIM TAM; JUDGE WILLIAMS.; JUDGE MICHAEL DIPIETRO;
JUDGE TANNER; CHAUTAUQUA D. HOOKER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Lydia Kay Griggsby, District Judge. (1:23-cv-01317-LKG)

Submitted: January 30, 2024 Decided: February 2, 2024

Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jermall Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-2110 Doc: 5 Filed: 02/02/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Jermall Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint under

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) without prejudice. ∗ We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Brown v. BOCSE

McGuire, Esq., No. 1:23-cv-01317-LKG (D. Md. Sept. 27, 2023). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

∗
The district court’s dismissal without prejudice is a final order because the district
court dismissed the complaint “without granting leave to amend.” Britt v. DeJoy, 45 F.4th
790, 791 (4th Cir. 2022) (en banc) (published order).

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9929741. Public record. Not legal advice.