# Brown v. Baltimore Gas

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · June 27, 1997

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/992465

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 27, 1997
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/992465

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1206

KEVIN S. BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY; BALTIMORE
GAS AND ELECTRIC LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-95-
3445-L)

Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 27, 1997

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin S. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Luther Ellis Justis, Jr.,
Constance F. Smith, BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary

judgment to his former employer in an action for disability bene-

fits and the order denying his motion for reconsideration, under

Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Baltimore
Gas & Elec. Co., No. CA-95-3445-L (D. Md. Dec. 10, 1996 & Jan. 23,

1997). We deny Appellant's motion to expedite and dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/992465. Public record. Not legal advice.