# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 28, 1997

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/992267

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** May 28, 1997
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/992267

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2275

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM ARTHUR BROWN,

Claimant - Appellant,

and

$11,864 US CURRENCY; $7,800 US CURRENCY,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior
District Judge. (CA-95-318-3-P)

Submitted: May 17, 1997 Decided: May 28, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Arthur Brown, Appellant Pro Se. William A. Brafford,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders granting summary

judgment and a judgment of forfeiture of $19,664 in United States

currency to the government and denying his motion for reconsidera-

tion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reason-
ing of the district court. United States v. Brown, No. CA-95-318-3-
P (W.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 15, & 30, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.

AFFIRMED

3

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/992267. Public record. Not legal advice.