# Board v. Davis

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 7, 1997

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/992169

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** May 7, 1997
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/992169

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2697

THOMAS BOARD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ELAINE DAVIS, Principal; MARGARRETT SHIPLEY,
Vice Principal; HAMDEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96-
2964-AMD)

Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 7, 1997

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Board, Appellant Pro Se. Jerome Allen Nicholas, Jr., BALTI-
MORE CITY DEPARTMENT OF LAW, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Board v. Davis,
No. CA-96-2964-AMD (D. Md. Oct. 2, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/992169. Public record. Not legal advice.