# Harold Loaiza-Quintana v. R. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · December 19, 2023

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9911825

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** December 19, 2023
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9911825

## Opinion text

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7003 Doc: 8 Filed: 12/19/2023 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-7003

HAROLD D. LOAIZA-QUINTANA,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN R. BROWN, FCI-Gilmer,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:23-cv-00293-JPB-JPM)

Submitted: December 14, 2023 Decided: December 19, 2023

Before GREGORY and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harold D. Loaiza-Quintana, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-7003 Doc: 8 Filed: 12/19/2023 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Harold D. Loaiza-Quintana, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(a). We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.

Loaiza-Quintana v. Brown, No. 5:23-cv-00293-JPB-JPM (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 20, 2023).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9911825. Public record. Not legal advice.
