# Cochran v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · December 24, 1996

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/991092

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** December 24, 1996
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/991092

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6575

ROBERT MORRIS COCHRAN, a/k/a Michael The
Archangel,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JESSE BROWN, Secretary of Veteran Affairs;
MICHAEL BOSWORTH, Assistant District Counsel;
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-96-70-5-H)

Submitted: October 15, 1996 Decided: December 24, 1996

Before HALL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Morris Cochran, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Robert Morris Cochran, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the

district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1994), amended by
Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321

(1996). We have reviewed the record, and we conclude that the

district court's dismissal of Cochran's complaint as frivolous was

not an abuse of its discretion. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Cochran v. Brown, No. CA-96-70-5-

H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 19, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/991092. Public record. Not legal advice.