# Mattison v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · October 10, 1996

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/990575

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 10, 1996
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/990575

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6526

CALVIN R. MATTISON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TONY BROWN; ROBERT CARRILES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-94-2610-9-6JC)

Submitted: October 3, 1996 Decided: October 10, 1996

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin R. Mattison, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Defen-

dants' motion for summary judgment in part and denying it in part.

We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is

not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P.

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).
The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable

interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/990575. Public record. Not legal advice.