# Villers v. Board of Trustees

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · June 27, 1996

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/989646

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 27, 1996
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/989646

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-3010

ORVIN FLOYD VILLERS; CHERYL VILLERS,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

BOARD OF TRUSTEES, SHEET METAL WORKERS' NA-
TIONAL PENSION FUND; LOCAL UNION NO. 33, SHEET
METAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Charles H. Haden II, Chief
District Judge. (CA-94-778)

Submitted: May 31, 1996 Decided: June 27, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Orvin Floyd Villers, Cheryl Villers, Appellants Pro Se. Robin Jean
Davis, John Francis Dascoli, SEGAL & DAVIS, L.C., Charleston, West
Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's order granting Ap-

pellees' motion for summary judgment in this civil action. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Villers v. Board of Trustees, Sheet Metal Workers
Nat'l Pension Fund, 901 F. Supp. 1111 (S.D.W. Va. 1995). We dis-

pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/989646. Public record. Not legal advice.