# Taylor v. Brown, Sec

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · June 3, 1996

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/989538

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 3, 1996
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/989538

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1069

NORMAN TAYLOR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RONALD H. BROWN, SECRETARY OF COMMERCE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
93-3745-DKC)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 3, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Norman Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Maury S. Epner, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting

summary judgment for Appellee in Appellant's age discrimination

action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opin-

ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Taylor v. Brown, No. CA-93-3745-
DKC (D. Md. Dec. 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/989538. Public record. Not legal advice.