# Brown v. VA Parole Board

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · June 6, 1996

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/989475

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 6, 1996
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/989475

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6268

MICHAEL LYNN BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-96-146-R)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 6, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Lynn Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Brown v. VA Parole Board, No. CA-96-146-R (W.D. Va. Feb. 14,
1996). Additionally, we deny Brown's motion to transport him to

this court to allow him to inspect the record. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/989475. Public record. Not legal advice.