# City of Akron v. Brown

> Ohio Court of Appeals · November 7, 2018 · 122 N.E.3d 672

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9887493

## Case

- **Full name:** CITY OF AKRON, Appellee v. Jennifer L. BROWN, Appellant
- **Court:** Ohio Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** November 7, 2018
- **Citations:** 122 N.E.3d 672; 2018 Ohio 4500
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Carr
- **Judges:** Schafer, Carr
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9887493

## Opinion text

CARR, J., CONCURRING.
{¶ 19} I write separately to note that I have very strong reservations regarding whether the language in R.C. 2925.11 is ambiguous and, furthermore, whether a plain meaning construction of the statutory language could lead to absurd results. Unfortunately, however, neither argument was raised in the trial court and may not be raised for the first time on appeal.
See
JPMorgan Chase Bank, Natl. Assn. v. Burden
, 9th Dist. Summit No. 27104,
2014-Ohio-2746
,
2014 WL 2918455
, ¶ 12.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9887493. Public record. Not legal advice.