# Bryson v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · November 4, 1975 · 57 Ala. App. 278

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9883961

## Case

- **Full name:** Jesse William BRYSON v. STATE
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
- **Decided:** November 4, 1975
- **Citations:** 57 Ala. App. 278; 327 So. 2d 916; 1975 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1266
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Cates
- **Judges:** Tyson
- **Cited by:** 6 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9883961

## Opinion text

CATES, Presiding Judge
(concurring specially).
In brief appellant complains of the District Attorney’s asking Mrs. Self how many days was it after appellant’s escape from a Georgia prison that she dyed his hair. I consider that prejudicial and irrelevant in a case where the defendant has chosen not to testify.
However, the District Attorney offered to connect up the sought for answer with further proof. Such further proof was not tendered. In this posture the defendant should have made a motion to exclude the disconnected evidence. McElroy, Evid. (2nd ed.) §426.01(6).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9883961. Public record. Not legal advice.
