# Marla Crawford v. Prince George's County Board of Education

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · October 2, 2023

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9881776

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 2, 2023
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9881776

## Opinion text

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1430 Doc: 16 Filed: 10/02/2023 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1430

MARLA F. CRAWFORD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (8:20-cv-00048-JKB)

Submitted: September 28, 2023 Decided: October 2, 2023

Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marla Crawford, Appellant Pro Se. Edmund J. O’Meally, PESSIN KATZ LAW, P.A.,
Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1430 Doc: 16 Filed: 10/02/2023 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Marla F. Crawford appeals the district court’s order denying her summary judgment

motion and granting Defendant summary judgment in Crawford’s employment

discrimination action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal

brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The

informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited

to issues preserved in that brief.”). We have reviewed the record in conjunction with the

arguments Crawford raises on appeal and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm the district court’s order. Crawford v. Prince George’s Cnty. Bd. of Educ., No. 8:20-

cv-00048-JKB (D. Md. filed Mar. 21, 2023 & entered Mar. 22, 2023). We deny all pending

motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9881776. Public record. Not legal advice.