# People v. Villa-Gomez

> California Court of Appeal · March 9, 2017 · 9 Cal. App. 5th 527

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9873071

## Case

- **Full name:** The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CESAR VILLA-GOMEZ, Defendant and Appellant
- **Court:** California Court of Appeal
- **Decided:** March 9, 2017
- **Citations:** 9 Cal. App. 5th 527; 215 Cal. Rptr. 3d 161; 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 207
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Duarte
- **Judges:** Murray, Duarte, Nicholson
- **Cited by:** 14 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9873071

## Opinion text

DUARTE, J.,
Concurring.—I concur in the judgment. I concur in the opinion, except part I.B.2., the analysis of prejudice and its conclusion. Because I agree with the conclusion reached in part I.B.l. of the discussion— that the trial did not err in admitting defendant’s gang affiliation statements during booking—I see no need to continue with a separate analysis of prejudice based on hypothetical error, and will refrain from doing so here.
Appellant’s petition for review by the Supreme Court was denied June 14, 2017, S241236.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9873071. Public record. Not legal advice.