# Dannat v. . Fuller

> New York Court of Appeals · June 10, 1890 · 120 N.Y. 554

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9867303

## Case

- **Full name:** William H. Dannat Et Al., Respondents, v. Norman J. Fuller, Appellant
- **Court:** New York Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** June 10, 1890
- **Citations:** 120 N.Y. 554; 31 N.Y. St. Rep. 825; 75 Sickels 554; 24 N.E. 815; 1890 N.Y. LEXIS 1292
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Bbown
- **Judges:** Bbown, Haight
- **Cited by:** 22 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9867303

## Opinion text

Bbown, J.,
dissenting upon the ground that under the findings of fact made by the referee, the proposition discussed by Judge Haight is not available to the appellant in this court. The point is not made in the appellant’s brief and was not argued orally and does not appear even to have been raised in the case.
All concur, except Bbown, J., dissenting, Bradley, J., not voting and Follett, Ch. J. not sitting.
Judgment reversed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9867303. Public record. Not legal advice.