# People v. Albrexstondare

> California Court of Appeal · February 18, 1925 · 71 Cal. App. 339

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9864640

## Case

- **Full name:** The PEOPLE, Respondent, v. R. H. W. ALBREXSTONDARE, Appellant
- **Court:** California Court of Appeal
- **Decided:** February 18, 1925
- **Citations:** 71 Cal. App. 339; 235 P. 87; 1925 Cal. App. LEXIS 606
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Houser
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9864640

## Opinion text

THE COURT.
Appellant’s petition to have the above-entitled causé heard and determined by this court after judgment in the district court of appeal is denied.
We neither approve nor disapprove the conclusion of that court that under the circumstances outlined in the opinion the members of the patient’s family would be accomplices if they had knowledge of the fact that the defendant did not have a license to practice medicine. We do not deem it necessary to express an opinion upon that question at this time.
Myers, C. J., Lawlor, J., Waste, J., and Shenk, J., concurred.
Lennon, J., and Seawell, J., concurred in the denial of the petition for hearing by this court.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9864640. Public record. Not legal advice.