# Irons v. Carey

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · November 6, 2007 · 506 F.3d 951

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9853913

## Case

- **Full name:** Carl Merton IRONS, II, Petitioner-Appellee, U.S. Attorney General, Intervenor, v. Tom L. CAREY, Warden, Respondent-Appellant
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** November 6, 2007
- **Citations:** 506 F.3d 951; 2007 WL 3256594
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Ferdinand, Fernandez, John, Kleinfeld, Noonan, Reinhardt, Stephen
- **Cited by:** 11 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9853913

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- discussing substantial differences between prison disciplinary proceedings and parole determinations

## Opinion text

Order; Dissent by Judge KLEINFELD.
ORDER
The panel has voted to deny the petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc.
The full court was advised of the petitions for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonre-cused active judges in favor of en banc reconsideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35.
The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are denied.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9853913. Public record. Not legal advice.