# State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Busch

> Supreme Court of Oklahoma · March 12, 1996 · 67 O.B.A.J. 2587

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9848995

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE of Oklahoma Ex Rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant, v. J. Michael BUSCH, Respondent
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** March 12, 1996
- **Citations:** 67 O.B.A.J. 2587; 919 P.2d 1114; 1996 OK 38; 1996 Okla. LEXIS 39; 1996 WL 104903
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Ala
- **Judges:** Summers, Ala, Kauger, Hodges, Lavender, Hargrave, Wilson, Simms, Watt
- **Cited by:** 26 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9848995

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that the ADA applies to lawyer disciplinary cases but finding no "reasonable accommodation” could be made with regard to the lawyer’s neglect of client matters and deceit in the court "which would accomplish the purpose of maintaining the integrity of the Bar.”

## Opinion text

OP ALA, Justice,
with whom SIMMS and WATT, JJ.,
join, concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur in the court’s view that respondent breached professional discipline and that the A.D.A. does not pose a legal impediment to imposition of sanctions; I dissent from today’s suspension. I would order respondent’s disbarment.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9848995. Public record. Not legal advice.