# Wright v. Dilbeck

> Court of Appeals of Georgia · July 2, 1970 · 122 Ga. App. 214

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9846139

## Case

- **Full name:** WRIGHT, Administratrix v. DILBECK Et Al.; SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. DILBECK Et Al.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Georgia
- **Decided:** July 2, 1970
- **Citations:** 122 Ga. App. 214; 176 S.E.2d 715; 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 837
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Eberhardt
- **Judges:** Pannell, Jordan, Eberhardt
- **Cited by:** 53 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9846139

## Opinion text

Eberhardt, Judge,
concurring. While I concur in the judgment of reversal, and am in agreement with the holding in other divisions of the opinion, I do not join in all that is said in Divisions 5, 8 and 12 of that portion of the opinion dealing with the appeal of Southern Railway Company. Concerning Division 9 of the opinion in the Wright appeal, it seems to me that there was some evidence which would have authorized the jury to find equal knowledge on Mr. Wright’s part — though it would not have demanded it — and that the charge was authorized as given.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9846139. Public record. Not legal advice.