# United States v. Calvin Matchett

> Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · September 13, 2016 · 837 F.3d 1118

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9836054

## Case

- **Full name:** UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Calvin MATCHETT, Defendant-Appellant
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
- **Decided:** September 13, 2016
- **Citations:** 837 F.3d 1118; 2016 WL 4757211
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Carnes, Tjoflat, Hull, Marcus, Wilson, Pryor, Martin, Jordan, Rosenbaum
- **Nature of suit:** ORD
- **Cited by:** 13 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9836054

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- acknowledging that "one of the main concerns behind arbitrary enforcement is the separation of powers"

## Opinion text

BY THE COURT:
A petition for rehearing having been filed and a member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in active service on this Court having voted against granting a rehearing en banc, it is ORDERED that this case will not be reheard en banc.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9836054. Public record. Not legal advice.