# Ohio Mfrs. Assn. v. Ohioans for Drug Price Relief Act (Slip Opinion)

> Ohio Supreme Court · August 15, 2016 · 149 Ohio St. 3d 250

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9835467

## Case

- **Full name:** Ohio Manufacturers’ Association Et Al. v. Ohioans for Drug Price Relief Act Et Al.
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** August 15, 2016
- **Citations:** 149 Ohio St. 3d 250; 74 N.E.3d 399; 2016 Ohio 5377
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by O'Neill
- **Judges:** Per Curiam French, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Kennedy, O'Neill, Pfeifer
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9835467

## Opinion text

O’Neill, J.,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
{¶ 61} I concur in all aspects of the court’s opinion except for the remedy. R.C. 3519.16(F) clearly anticipates a signature shortage. The statute gives respondents ten days to cure their shortage and gives the secretary of state until 65 days prior to the election to determine the sufficiency of the additional signatures. R.C. 3519.16(F). “If they are sufficient, the amendment, proposed law, or law shall be placed on the ballot as required by law.” Id.
{¶ 62} We are currently 85 days before the election. Implementation of the remedy is not our job. Interpretation of the law is.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9835467. Public record. Not legal advice.