# Boydstun v. Fort Worth Independent School Dist.

> Court of Appeals of Texas · September 20, 1930 · 33 S.W.2d 811

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9834384

## Case

- **Full name:** BOYDSTUN Et Al. v. FORT WORTH INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. Et Al.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** September 20, 1930
- **Citations:** 33 S.W.2d 811
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Conner
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9834384

## Opinion text

On Motion for Rehearing.
In the motion for rehearing, relators insist, among other things, that we erred, in denying the application under consideration in advance of a review and determination of the appeal from the order of the Ninety-Sixth district court, which had granted a temporary writ of injunction, as was in that proceeding sought.
It is to be noted, however, that th& appeal referred to had not been fully perfected by filing in this court the transcript and statement of facts, and hence the order in that proceeding was not before us for determination. Moreover, the district court permitted the filing -of a supersedeas bond which had the effect of suspending its order. Houtchens v. Mercer (Tex. Com. App.) 29 SW.(2d) 1031 , 69 A. L. R. 1103, and the application herein involved is an original one, in no wise affected by the action of the district court.
Other questions we think are sufficiently disposed of in our original opinion, and the motion for rehearing is accordingly overruled.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9834384. Public record. Not legal advice.