# Chapman v. Guaranty State Bank

> Court of Appeals of Texas · January 5, 1924 · 259 S.W. 972

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9833954

## Case

- **Full name:** CHAPMAN, Commissioner of Insurance and Banking, Et Al. v. GUARANTY STATE BANK Et Al.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** January 5, 1924
- **Citations:** 259 S.W. 972
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Conner
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9833954

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- stating that the guaranty fund was "wholly within the control of the state banking board”

## Opinion text

On Motion for Rehearing.
The material questions presented in the motion for rehearing are, we think, substantially the same as those we attempted to dispose of in our original opinion, and we do not feel clear that we can add anything of particular benefit to what is there said and implied, and to all of which we can do no better than to adhere. The motion for rehearing is accordingly overruled.
The motion for additional findings will also_ be overruled, as we conclude that the findings sought are either immaterial, or evidentiary in character, or appear undisputed, in neither of which events is it our duty to make additional findings.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9833954. Public record. Not legal advice.