# Ivey v. Keeling

> Court of Appeals of Texas · March 8, 1929 · 15 S.W.2d 1097

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9828268

## Case

- **Full name:** IVEY Et Al. v. KEELING Et Al.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** March 8, 1929
- **Citations:** 15 S.W.2d 1097; 1929 Tex. App. LEXIS 402
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Hickman
- **Cited by:** 9 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9828268

## Opinion text

On Motion for Rehearing.
Among other errors assigned in their motion for rehearing, appellants assign error in our original opinion in the holding that, conceding their right to maintain their suit, the allegations of their petition were insufficient to state a cause of action.
This statement in our original opinion was not necessary to the decision, but was an additional reason for affirmance added to the opinion. ■ We are still impressed that the allegations were insufficient; but, since that holding was really unnecessary, it is withdrawn, and the decision will be based solely upon the other grounds set forth in the opinion.
The motion for rehearing has been carefully considered, but, as we are'Still of the opinion that our original holding was correct, the motion is overruled.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9828268. Public record. Not legal advice.