# Smith v. Dannelly

> Supreme Court of Alabama · April 28, 1932 · 224 Ala. 592

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9825231

## Case

- **Full name:** Smith v. Dannelly.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** April 28, 1932
- **Citations:** 224 Ala. 592; 141 So. 569; 1932 Ala. LEXIS 150
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Anderson
- **Judges:** Foster, Anderson, Brown, Bouldin, Gardner, Thomas, Knight
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9825231

## Opinion text

ANDERSON, C. J., and BROWN, J.,
concur in the result on the sole ground that the record shows that the motion was made after pleading to the merits, and, therefore, came too late, and cite as authority for their position Heflin v. Rock Mills Mfg. & Lumber Co., 58 Ala. 613 ; Brown v. Bamberger, 110 Ala. 342 , 20 So. 114 ; Victor Adding Mach. Co. v. Long, 20 Ala. App. 633 , 104 So. 679 .

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9825231. Public record. Not legal advice.