# Caldwell v. Baxter

> Supreme Court of Oklahoma · September 22, 1931 · 158 Okla. 76

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9824623

## Case

- **Full name:** CALDWELL, Ex'x, v. BAXTER Et Al.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** September 22, 1931
- **Citations:** 158 Okla. 76; 12 P.2d 509; 1931 OK 538; 1931 Okla. LEXIS 720
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Riley
- **Judges:** Andrews, Clark, Cullison, Hefner, Kornegay, Lester, McNEILL, Riley, Swindall
- **Cited by:** 10 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9824623

## Opinion text

RILEY, J.,
concurs in conclusion, but dissents to the holding that repugnant defenses may not be united in one answer. Citing Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. Ware, 71 Okla. 19 , 174 P. 1066 ; Covington v. Fisher, 22 Okla. 207 , 97 P. 615 .
ANDREWS, J., absent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9824623. Public record. Not legal advice.