# Crow v. State

> Alabama Court of Appeals · May 25, 1937 · 28 Ala. App. 319

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9824573

## Case

- **Full name:** Crow v. State.
- **Court:** Alabama Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** May 25, 1937
- **Citations:** 28 Ala. App. 319; 183 So. 897; 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 200
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Bricken
- **Cited by:** 11 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9824573

## Opinion text

On Rehearing.
Appellant makes motion to strike the application for rehearing in this case, upon the grounds of the failure of appellee to comply with the provisions of Supreme Court Rule 38, in that, appellee did not, within fifteen days, file and serve a brief upon counsel for appellant as said rule requires. Ample proof to sustain the facts upon which the motion is rested, has been furnished this court, and is without dispute.
The motion to strike appears to be well taken, and is granted upon authority of Supreme Court Rule 38; Taylor v. State, 27 Ala.App. 538 , 175 So. 698 ; Williams v. State, 27 Ala.App. 525 , 175 So. 697 .
Opinion amplified and extended.
Application stricken.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9824573. Public record. Not legal advice.