# Boone Coleman Construction, Inc. v. Village of Piketon

> Ohio Supreme Court · February 24, 2016 · 145 Ohio St. 3d 450

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9821748

## Case

- **Full name:** Boone Coleman Construction, Inc., Appellee, v. the Village of Piketon, Appellant
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** February 24, 2016
- **Citations:** 145 Ohio St. 3d 450; 50 N.E.3d 502; 2016 Ohio 628
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Kennedy
- **Judges:** French, Kennedy, Lanzinger, O'Connor, O'Donnell, O'Neill, Pfeifer
- **Cited by:** 36 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9821748

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- explaining that Boone Coleman Construction submitted the lowest bid, was hired for the project, and then the parties entered into a written contract
- explaining that the interpretation of a contract is a question of law that courts review de novo.

## Opinion text

Kennedy, J.,
concurring.
*463 Stephen C. Rodeheffer and John A. Gambill, for appellee.
Kegler Brown Hill & Ritter, L.P.A., Eric B. Travers, and Timothy A. Kelley, for appellant.
Bricker & Eckler, L.L.P., Jack R. Rosati Jr., and Adam F. Florey, urging reversal for amici curiae, County Commissioners Association of Ohio, Ohio Municipal League, Ohio School Boards Association, and Ohio Township Association.
{¶ 43} I agree with the majority opinion. However, I would exclude the first paragraph of the majority’s conclusion.
{¶ 44} Therefore, I respectfully concur.
O’Donnell, J., concurs in the foregoing opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9821748. Public record. Not legal advice.