# In Re Christine M. MIRE

> Supreme Court of Louisiana · February 19, 2016 · 197 So. 3d 656

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9821703

## Case

- **Full name:** In Re: Christine M. Mire
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Louisiana
- **Decided:** February 19, 2016
- **Citations:** 197 So. 3d 656; 2016 La. LEXIS 228
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Hughes
- **Judges:** Guidry, Weimer, Hughes
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9821703

## Opinion text

HUGHES, J.,
dissenting.
h Alteration of the transcript of a recorded judicial proceeding is a serious, perhaps criminal, matter. This court does justice no favor by punishing the whistle-blower. As pointed out by Justice Weimer, the majority manages to avoid the hard evidence that the alteration in this case was no accident or “malfunction”. I concur with Justice Weimer’s dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9821703. Public record. Not legal advice.