# State v. Roshchin

> Court of Appeals of Maryland · January 26, 2016 · 446 Md. 128

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9821264

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE of Maryland, Et Al. v. Vadim ROSHCHIN, Et Al.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Maryland
- **Decided:** January 26, 2016
- **Citations:** 446 Md. 128; 130 A.3d 453; 2016 Md. LEXIS 7
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Adkins
- **Judges:** Barbera, Battaglia, Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Watts, Harrell
- **Cited by:** 44 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9821264

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- explaining that “because it is clear” that the plaintiff’s Article 24 claim was “based on an alleged arrest without proper justification,” the court applied “the same standard in assessing this claim as is applicable to an alleged violation of the Fourth Amendment to the Unite…
- holding that “even when the language is unambiguous, it is useful to review the legislative history of the 37 statute to confirm that interpretation and to eliminate another version of legislative intent alleged to be latent in the language.”
- noting that “it is a common maxim of statutory construction that related statutes governing the same subject are to be construed together and harmonized”
- explaining that even in instances “when the language is unambiguous, it is useful to review legislative history of the statute to confirm that interpretation”

## Opinion text

*154 ADKINS, J.,
dissenting.
Respectfully, I dissent. I would hold that the arrest was not valid for the reasons set forth in the opinion authored by Judge Kehoe for the Court of Special Appeals.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9821264. Public record. Not legal advice.