# Konyk v. Pennsylvania State Police of the Commonwealth

> Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · January 12, 2016 · 133 A.3d 96

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9821033

## Case

- **Full name:** Steven KONYK, Petitioner, v. the PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE OF the COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent
- **Court:** Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** January 12, 2016
- **Citations:** 133 A.3d 96; 2016 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 48; 2016 WL 121206
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Leadbetter
- **Judges:** Pellegrini, McGinley, Leadbetter, Jubelirer, Leavitt, Brobson, Covey
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9821033

## Opinion text

CONCURRING OPINION BY
Judge LEADBETTER.
For the reasons' stated in Taylor v. Pennsylvania State Police, 132 A.3d 590 , 2016 WL 119972 (Pa.Cmwlth.2016) and Dougherty v. Pennsylvania State Police, 2016 WL 131962 (Pa.Cmwlth., No. 537 M.D.2014, filed January 12, 2016), I disagree with the majority’s discussion under the heading “Mandamus,” although I agree *102 ■with- the balance of its opinion. Accordingly, I concur, in the result.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9821033. Public record. Not legal advice.