# Ramiro Tula Rubio v. Loretta Lynch

> Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · October 28, 2015 · 805 F.3d 185

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9819913

## Case

- **Full name:** Ramiro Constantino TULA RUBIO, Also Known as Ramiro Tula, Petitioner v. Loretta LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 28, 2015
- **Citations:** 805 F.3d 185; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 18794; 2015 WL 6657575
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Jones, Stewart, Haynes, Brown
- **Nature of suit:** Immigration
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9819913

## Opinion text

ORDER:
A member of the court in active service having requested a poll on the reconsideration of this cause en banc, and a majority of ‘the judges in active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. *186 R. App. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35), rehearing en bane is DENIED.
In the en banc poll, 5 judges voted in favor of rehearing (Judges Jones, Smith, Clement, Owen, and Elrod), and 10 judges voted against rehearing (Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Jolly, Davis, Dennis, Prado, Southwick, Haynes, Graves,. Hig-ginson, and Costa).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9819913. Public record. Not legal advice.