# Heidle v. Baldwin

> Ohio Supreme Court · March 28, 1928 · 118 Ohio St. 375

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9817071

## Case

- **Full name:** Heidle Et Al., Partners, D. B. A. Heidle & Schelle, v. Baldwin; The Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Presti
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** March 28, 1928
- **Citations:** 118 Ohio St. 375; 118 Ohio St. (N.S.) 375; 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 222; 161 N.E. 44; 58 A.L.R. 1186; 1928 Ohio LEXIS 330
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Jones
- **Judges:** Marshall, Jones, Allen, Kinkade, Robinson, Matthias
- **Cited by:** 47 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9817071

## Opinion text

Jones, J.,
concurs in the judgment, but thinks the syllabus as a whole is vague and misleading, in that it does not sufficiently safeguard the rights of the driver on the main highway given him by Sections 6310-28 and 6310-31, General Code.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9817071. Public record. Not legal advice.