# Blanche Road Corp. v. Bensalem Township

> Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · May 26, 1995 · 57 F.3d 253

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9815925

## Case

- **Full name:** BLANCHE ROAD CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania Corporation, General Partner and Trading as Blanche Road Associates, I, a Pennsylvania Limited Partnership v. BENSALEM TOWNSHIP; David Gary Costello; Joseph Francano; John J. Maher, Jr.; Joseph Ryan; Patricia A. Zajac; James Nolan; Charles W. Seeberger; Thomas J. Walls; Carmen Raddi; Nandi Thakuria; Herbert T. Scheuren, Jr., Individually and D/B/A Environmental Engineering Kinetics International, Inc. D/B/A E.E.K.I., Inc. D/B/A Delaware Valley Consulting Engineers, Inc.; Lillian E. Steiner; Daniel D. Staerk; William Richard Oettinger; Emil F. Toften, Esquire; Jahn Roos Landis, Esquire, Blanche Road Corporation, Appellant in 94-1344, Bensalem Township, David Gary Costello (In His Official Capacity), Joseph Francano, John J. Maher, Jr. (In His Official Capacity), Joseph Ryan (In His Official Capacity), Patricia A. Zajac, James Nolan, Charles Seeberger, Thomas Walls, Carmen Raddi, Lillian E. Steiner, Daniel D. Staerk, William Richard Oettinger, Emil F. Toften, Esquire, and Jahn Roos Landis, Esquire, Appellants in 94-1362
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- **Decided:** May 26, 1995
- **Citations:** 57 F.3d 253
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Stapleton, Roth, Lewis, Sloviter, Becker, Mansmann, Greenberg, Hutchinson, Scirica, Cowen, Nygaard, Alito, McKee, Sarokin
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9815925

## Opinion text

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING IN BANC
June 21, 1995
The petitions for rehearing filed by appel-lees/cross appellants Bensalem Township, David Costello, John J. Maher, Jr. and Joseph Ryan in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petitions for rehearing are denied.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9815925. Public record. Not legal advice.