# Lundy v. Adamar of New Jersey, Inc.

> Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · July 5, 1994 · 34 F.3d 1173

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9815854

## Case

- **Full name:** Sidney LUNDY; Claire Lundy, Appellants, v. ADAMAR OF NEW JERSEY, INC., T/A Trop World, Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff, v. Dr. Domenic Frank CARLINO, Individually; Dr. Domenic Frank Carlino, a Professional Association, Third-Party Defendants
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- **Decided:** July 5, 1994
- **Citations:** 34 F.3d 1173; 1994 WL 316810
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Becker, Stapleton, Restani, Trade, Sloviter, Mansmann, Greenberg, Hutchinson, Scirica, Cowen, Nygaard, Alito, Roth, Lewis, McKee
- **Cited by:** 10 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9815854

## Opinion text

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING
Aug. 12, 1994
BEFORE: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, GREENBERG, HUTCHINSON, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, LEWIS, and McKEE, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, * Judge, United States Court of International Trade.
The petition for rehearing filed by appellants in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petition for rehearing is denied.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9815854. Public record. Not legal advice.