# United States v. Princeton Gamma-Tech, Inc.

> Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · August 1, 1994 · 31 F.3d 138

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9815848

## Case

- **Full name:** UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. PRINCETON GAMMA-TECH, INC., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, Jeffrey Sands; 206 Center, Inc.; Hilton Realty Company of Princeton, Inc. (George Sands & Jeffrey Sands T/A Hilton Realty Company of Princeton, Inc.); George Sands; Estelle Sands; Fifth Dimensions, Inc.; J & R Associates, Ltd.; Princeton Chemical Research, Inc.; Cornelius Van Cleef; Frederick Decicco; Joseph A. Baicker; Alden Sayres; ABC Co. (1-100), John Doe (1-100), XYZ Co. (1-100), Jane Doe (1-100), Third-Party Defendants, Princeton Gamma-Tech, Inc., Appellant
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- **Decided:** August 1, 1994
- **Citations:** 31 F.3d 138
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Mansmann, Nygaard, Weis
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9815848

## Opinion text

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING
Nov. 1, 1994
The petition for rehearing filed by appellee in the above entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court and to all other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petition for rehearing is denied. Judge Hutchinson would have granted rehearing.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9815848. Public record. Not legal advice.