# Kruzits v. Okuma MacHine Tool, Inc.

> Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · November 15, 1994 · 40 F.3d 52

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9815820

## Case

- **Full name:** Charles Sean KRUZITS and Mary Kruzits v. OKUMA MACHINE TOOL, INC.; Heller Financial, Inc.; Gosiger, Inc. v. Vincent W. VISCO, D/B/A Vistek Industries, Third-Party Defendant, Heller Financial, Inc., Appellant
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- **Decided:** November 15, 1994
- **Citations:** 40 F.3d 52; 1994 WL 636464
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Greenberg, Roth, Rosenn, Sloviter, Becker, Stapleton, Mansmann, Hutchinson, Scirica, Cowen, Nygaard, Alito, Lewis, McKee, Sarokin
- **Cited by:** 6 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9815820

## Opinion text

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING
Dec. 14, 1994
Before: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, and BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, GREENBERG, HUTCHINSON, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, LEWIS, McKEE, SAROKIN, and ROSENN, Circuit Judges.
The petition for rehearing filed by the appellee, Vincent W. Visco, d/b/a Vistek Industries, in the above captioned matter having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court and to all the other available circuit judges of the court in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petition for rehearing is denied.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9815820. Public record. Not legal advice.