# Hordin v. City of Cleveland

> Ohio Court of Appeals · July 9, 1945 · 77 Ohio App. 491

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9815045

## Case

- **Full name:** HORDIN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CLEVELAND (City), Et Al., Defendants-Appellants
- **Court:** Ohio Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** July 9, 1945
- **Citations:** 77 Ohio App. 491; 43 Ohio Law. Abs. 515; 33 Ohio Op. 336; 62 N.E.2d 889; 1945 Ohio App. LEXIS 572
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Morgan
- **Judges:** Skeel, Morgan, Lieghley
- **Cited by:** 6 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9815045

## Opinion text

MORGAN, J.,
concurs in the decree for defendants on the first cause of action but DISSENTS from the similar decree on the second cause of action for the reason that property and assets of the Railway Advertising Company were property and assets of the “transit system” within the meaning of Sec. 113-3 of the City Charter and therefore could not be disposed of without the consent of the City Council.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9815045. Public record. Not legal advice.