# Sandra Farinacci v. City of Garfield Heights

> Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · February 7, 2012 · 461 F. App'x 447

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9814668

## Case

- **Full name:** Sandra FARINACCI, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF GARFIELD HEIGHTS, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- **Decided:** February 7, 2012
- **Citations:** 461 F. App'x 447
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by White
- **Judges:** McKeague, White, Barrett
- **Cited by:** 7 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9814668

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that an express term that delegated a third party the power to admit other parties onto the property conferred actual authority over the premises for Fourth Amendment purposes
- affirming that “[w]hen [plaintiff] signed her mortgage, which included the property preservation provisions, she expressly assumed the risk that, if it became necessary to preserve the property, the bank might permit its agents and others to enter the house to effectuate that …

## Opinion text

HELENE N. WHITE, Circuit Judge,
concurring.
I agree that plaintiffs made no showing that Wervey’s letter had any connection to the allegedly wrongful entry into the home. Nor have plaintiffs shown that the City of Garfield Heights has a policy or custom of entering homes in violation of Fourth Amendment rights of homeowners.
I concur as to the remaining defendants on the narrow basis that the individual defendants are entitled to qualified immunity where they acted pursuant to the request of the authorized property-protection company after viewing the property and confirming that the property appeared vacant and in the process of being damaged by abandoned cats.
For the same reasons, the district court correctly determined that the defendants did not act recklessly.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9814668. Public record. Not legal advice.