# Kernodle v. . Kernodle

> Supreme Court of North Carolina · October 31, 1917 · 174 N.C. 441

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9810537

## Case

- **Full name:** L. L. Kernodle v. John D. Kernodle and Wife.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of North Carolina
- **Decided:** October 31, 1917
- **Citations:** 174 N.C. 441; 93 S.E. 956; 1917 N.C. LEXIS 115
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by BbowN
- **Judges:** Allen, Bbown
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9810537

## Opinion text

BbowN, I.,
dissenting: I admit that tbe point presented by tbis appeal is identical with that presented in Kernodle v. Williams, 153 N. C., 475 . My views are very fully and clearly presented in tbe dissenting opinion by Justice Manning in that case.. I heartily concur^witb what is said by Justice Shepherd in Moffett v. Maness, 102 N. C., 457 , that “There is too great a tendency to relax the- well-settled rules of evidence against thé admissibility of parol evidence to contradict, vary, or add to tbe terms of a written contract.”

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9810537. Public record. Not legal advice.