# CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC v. GRAVITT

> Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · January 27, 2015 · 350 P.3d 401

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9810233

## Case

- **Full name:** CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC, Successor by Merger to Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Billy GRAVITT A/K/A Bill L. Gravitt and Jane Doe, His Spouse, if Married; And Occupants of the Premises, Defendants/Appellees, and Arvest Bank F/K/A McIlroy Bank & Trust, Successor by Merger to Superior Bank; And Capital One Bank, N.A., Defendants
- **Court:** Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** January 27, 2015
- **Citations:** 350 P.3d 401; 2015 OK CIV APP 46; 2015 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 39; 2015 WL 3612961
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Thornbrugh
- **Judges:** Barnes, Rapp, Thornbrugh
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9810233

## Opinion text

THORNBRUGH, J.,
concurring specially.
[ 1 I concur specially to emphasize that the district courts should avoid being beguiled into accepting the notion that any and all questions regarding the final validity or enforceability of a note have become "standing" issues and, hence, "jurisdictional" issues. I join the majority here to state emphatically that attaching a copy of a facially enforceable note to a petition establishes a prima facie case for standing. All further questions regarding the final legal right of the Plaintiff to foreclose on the note and mortgage remain merits questions.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9810233. Public record. Not legal advice.