# Mark Robbins v. Randy Becker, Sr.

> Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · July 27, 2015 · 794 F.3d 988

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9809680

## Case

- **Full name:** Mark ROBBINS; Gail Robbins; I-44 Truck Center and Wrecker Service, LLC; I-44 Wrecker Service, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Randy BECKER, Sr.; James Cox; Ryan A. Burckhardt; Daniel E. Dicus; Travis Inman; Ronald Johnson; Jeremie Keathely; Lee A. Kenley; Keith Lichay; Justin McCullough; Brent Moore; John Oliveras; Duane L. Robinson; Rhonda Shanika; John Does, Police Officers; John Does, Dispatchers; Jane Does, Dispatchers; Each in Their Individual Capacities, Defendants-Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
- **Decided:** July 27, 2015
- **Citations:** 794 F.3d 988; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12934; 2015 WL 4508749
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Loken
- **Judges:** Riley, Loken, Shepherd
- **Cited by:** 91 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9809680

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- explaining that “[i]dentifying the disparity in treatment is especially important in class-of-one cases”

## Opinion text

*998 LOKEN, Circuit Judge,
concurring.
I join the opinion of the court except the Equal Protection Clause analysis in Part II.B.2. As to that Part, I concur in the judgment because plaintiffs failed to make an adequate showing that any officer’s discretionary actions were the product of intentional discrimination, malice, or other improper motive.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9809680. Public record. Not legal advice.