# State of Florida v. Lawrence Andrew Ingram

> Supreme Court of Florida · July 2, 2015 · 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 402

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9808960

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Lawrence Andrew INGRAM, Respondent
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Florida
- **Decided:** July 2, 2015
- **Citations:** 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 402; 170 So. 3d 727; 2015 Fla. LEXIS 1433; 2015 WL 3999167
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Canady
- **Judges:** Canady, Labarga, Lewis, Pariente, Per Curiam, Perry, Polston, Quince
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9808960

## Opinion text

CANADY, J.,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I agree with the majority that this case should be dismissed because the issue in controversy is now moot. I disagree, however, with the decision to vacate the Fifth District’s opinion. Having determined that the case should be dismissed, we lack jurisdiction to take any action regarding the decision on review.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9808960. Public record. Not legal advice.